Suitable For Mixed Company

The Manhattan Declaration

Posted by: kathrynjudson on: January 4, 2010

Christians from across doctrinal divides are joining to speak in one voice for the sanctity of life, amongst other things, by signing and promoting The Manhattan Declaration: A Call of Christian Conscience.

hat tip: Plain Catholic in the Mountains

(cross-posted at Ladies for Life)

Book note: Streams in the Desert, by Mrs. Chas E. Cowman

Posted by: kathrynjudson on: January 4, 2010

One of the most requested devotionals in our bookstore since the get-go has been Streams in the Desert, by Mrs. Charles E. Cowman, which has been in print since 1924. A while back, I snagged a 1965 print run copy for myself. By then, there were already more than two million copies in print. I can see why. It’s a gem.

It’s a compilation of thoughts and quotes, in the form of a daily devotional. I think part of its staying power is that it focuses on faith that grows in times of trial, something all too many Christian books either gloss over or avoid, or simply don’t understand. Mrs. Cowman served as a missionary in China and Japan, and spent six years nursing a dying husband. The back cover copy on my book reads:

“We thank Thee Lord, for weary days

When desert streams were dry,

And first we knew what depths of need

Thy Love could satisfy.

We thank Thee for the rest in Him

The weary only know-

The perfect, wondrous sympathy

We needs must learn below.

The touch that heals the broken heart

is never felt above;

The angels know His blessedness,

His way-worn saints, His love.”

There are several versions still in print, including ‘updated’ editions, put into more modern English, so I’m linking here to the author’s page at Zondervan, so you can browse the offerings.

There are other books out there with the same title, by the way, so if you are ordering elsewhere, make sure you have the book by Mrs. Cowman.

Toddler Shakespeare

Posted by: kathrynjudson on: January 4, 2010

hat tip: Amy Welborn

Book note: Liberal Fascism, by Jonah Goldberg

Posted by: kathrynjudson on: December 3, 2009

OK, so I’m a couple of years late to this party, but I finally got my hands on a copy of Liberal Fascism by Jonah Goldberg. I’m about a third of the way through it. I want to buy copies and give them away. I can’t really afford to right now, but I’d like to.

Don’t let the cutsie cover art fool you. This is a well-researched, thoughtful, scholarly, well-written, and considerate look at the intellectual and political currents of the twentieth century that swept away personal freedoms and foundational values, and continue to do so.

I’ve read a fair bit of history. But this book is teaching me much I didn’t know. For instance, how much do you know about Woodrow Wilson? Really? He’s generally been a person I’ve only heard about in passing. Uhm. Why is that? The man did much to overthrow much of what was good in this country and its government. He bears study, I think, and Goldberg does a good job of presenting what Wilson did, and what he stood for, and who and what influenced him.

More later, I hope, when I’ve read the whole book.

Up Time

Posted by: kathrynjudson on: December 3, 2009

Blest with that loveliest of all adorning

Posted by: kathrynjudson on: November 7, 2009

From the Preface by the Writer in The War Romance of the Salvation Army, by Grace Livingston Hill, c 1919, J. T. Lippincot Company (online here):

After the privilege of close association with them for some time I have come to feel that the most noticeable and lovely thing about the girls is the way they wear their womanhood, as if it were a flower, or a rare jewel. One of these girls, who, by the way, had been nine months in France, all of it under shell fire, said to me:

“I used to wish I had been born a boy, they are not hampered so much as women are; but after I went to France and saw what a good woman meant to those boys in the trenches I changed my mind, and I’m glad I was born a woman. It means a great deal to be a woman.”

And so there is no coquetry about these girls, no little personal vanity such as girls who are thinking of themselves often have. They take great care to be neat and sweet and serviceable, but as they are not thinking of themselves, but only how they may serve, they are blest with that loveliest of all adorning, a meek and quiet spirit and a joy of living and content that only forgetfulness of self and communion with Jesus Christ can bring.

The Saturday Review of Books…

Posted by: kathrynjudson on: November 7, 2009

Yesterday, while shifting books around to freshen up the display at the check-out counter, I decided I needed a mass market Christian novel to round things out. So over I tootled to that section, and dug around – and picked out a book by Grace Livingston Hill, who still sells well decades after her death. But… After I got it spotlighted in a primo location, the book kept catching my eye (always a hazard if you’re a booklover working in a bookstore), and so I brought it home to read (always an option if you own the bookstore). It turns out to be not a romance novel after all, but a history of the Salvation Army in World War I, co-authored with Evangeline Booth. Although I’m only to page 22 in my copy of the book, it’s looking very much like I’m going to be able to recommend The War Romance of the Salvation Army to history lovers (whether Christian or not) as well as Christians (whether history lovers or not).

Here’s a taste (via GraceLivingstonHill.com, and Project Gutenberg):

The advance guard of the American Expeditionary Forces had landed in France, and other detachments were arriving almost daily. They were received by the French with open arms and a big parade as soon as they landed. Flowers were tossed in their path and garlands were flung about them. They were lauded and praised on every hand. On the crest of this wave of enthusiasm they could have swept joyously into battle and never lost their smiles.

But instead of going to the front at once they were billeted in little French villages and introduced to French rain and French mud.

When one discovers that the houses are built of stone, stuck together mainly by this mud of the country, and remembers how many years they have stood, one gets a passing idea of the nature of this mud about which the soldiers have written home so often. It is more like Portland cement than anything else, and it is most penetrative and hard to get rid of; it gets in the hair, down the neck, into the shoes and it sticks. If the soldier wears hip-boots in the trenches he must take them off every little while and empty the mud out of them which somehow manages to get into even hip-boots. It is said that one reason the soldiers were obliged to wear the wrapped leggings was, not that they would keep the water out, but that they would strain the mud and at least keep the feet comparatively clean.

There were sixteen of these camps at this time and probably twelve or thirteen thousand soldiers were already established in them.

There was no great cantonment as at the camps on this side of the water, nor yet a city of tents, as one might have expected. The forming of a camp meant the taking over of all available buildings in the little French peasant villages. The space was measured up by the town mayor and the battalion leader and the proper number of men assigned to each building. In this way a single division covered a territory of about thirty kilometers. This system made a camp of any size available in very short order and also fooled the Huns, who were on the lookout for American camps.

These villages were the usual farming villages, typical of eastern France. They are not like American villages, but a collection of farm yards, the houses huddled together years ago for protection against roving bands of marauders. The farmer, instead of living upon his land, lives in the village, and there he has his barn for his cattle, his manure pile is at his front door, the drainage from it seeps back under the house at will, his chickens and pigs running around the streets.

These houses were built some five or eight hundred years ago, some a thousand or twelve hundred years. One house in the town aroused much curiosity because it was called the “new” house. It looked just like all the others. One who was curious asked why it should have received this appellative and was told because it was the last one that was built–only two hundred and fifty years ago.

There is a narrow hall or court running through these houses which is all that separates the family from the horses and pigs and cows which abide under the same roof.

The whole place smells alike. There is no heat anywhere, save from a fireplace in the kitchen. There is a community bakehouse.

The soldiers were quartered in the barns and outhouses, the officers were quartered in the homes of these French peasants. There were no comforts for either soldier or officer. It rained almost continuously and at night it was cold. No dining-rooms could be provided where the men could eat and they lined up on the street, got their chow and ate it standing in the rain or under whatever cover they could find. Few of them could understand any French, and all the conditions surrounding their presence in France were most trying to them. They were drilled from morning to night. They were covered with mud. The great fight in which they had come to participate was still afar off. No wonder their hearts grew heavy with a great longing for home. Gloom sat upon their faces and depression grew with every passing hour.

God’s questions

Posted by: kathrynjudson on: November 7, 2009

This winsome post by Angie Smith (House of Mercy, at Bring the Rain, Nov. 1, 2009) begins:

I have long been fascinated by the questions that the Lord asks in the Bible. It started when I was reading through Genesis (one of my favorite books of the Bible, seriously) and I came to the part where Adam and Eve had sinned and then decided it would be a brilliant idea to run from Him.

Because God isn’t really that great at finding people, you know.

So anyway, God asks, “Where are you?”

And I think that’s kind of funny because when I read it years ago I thought maybe He was serious. Maybe He was thinking He had added a little too much of the landscape and now He had gone and lost His very first man. And instead of reconsidering that, I thought that instead of asking, He should have just made it so they couldn’t hide, or better yet, just fire up his powers and hone in on them.

Or, maybe He knew where they were the whole time.

Due to the fact that He is all-knowing, all-powerful God of the universe, I’m going to stick with B.

But why would He ask if he knew the answer?

Read the rest. Do.

Liberty, Power, and Principles

Posted by: kathrynjudson on: November 6, 2009

The following is from a letter Donald J. Boudreaux sent to the Washington Post:

Speculations centered on party struggles are tiresome.

The real struggle is between persons who love liberty and persons enthralled with power.  A liberty lover refuses to exercise power over others and, therefore, has solid principles upon which he can stand when defending himself against those who would exercise power over him.  In contrast, someone enthralled with power – by endorsing its exercise over others – kicks out from beneath his own feet the principles he will need to stand on when the time comes for him to defend himself against the power of those who would force him to submit to their will.

Full letter here.

Discussing books, history, home life, and other things. Politely. (And mostly with good cheer.)

 

February 2010
S M T W T F S
« Jan    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28